What is the review process?
After editorial review and dialogue, entries are peer-reviewed by a reviewer who is highly knowledgeable about the topic to confirm that the content is reliable and up-to-date. Their feedback is shared with the author to revise and improve the entry. Given that entry topics are intersectional by nature, and often present new or emerging concepts, we invite reviewers with relevant expertise, but cannot guarantee that every perspective is reflected in the review process.
Who are reviewers?
Our reviewers include researchers, health professionals, policy analysts, indigenous knowledge holders, writers, social justice activists, artists, educators, and experts by experience. Our growing network of reviewers reflects the plurality of perspectives and disciplines knit into entries.
How can I participate as a reviewer?
We are always seeking to grow our network of reviewers. If you would like to share your expertise, please contact us or fill out our get involved form.
Reviewer network
We are deeply grateful to all who have shared their expertise to support the curation of reliable, verifiable, independent and free information about the interface of climate change and mental health. With thanks to:
Alex Trope
Andrew Sears
Carol Lim
Chris Hoffman
Devora Neumark
Elizabeth Pinksy
Harriet Shugarman
Howard Kurtzman
Jane Fortna
Jeremy Bekker
Jeremy Wortzel
Jessica Ngo
John Englander
Josephine Ferorelli
Karyn Todes
Kim Boller
Leah Douglas
Lennard Davis
Lise Van Susteren
Mercy Njeru
Monica Palmeira
Patricia Hasbach
Prasanta Kumar Roy
Robin Cooper
Roya Abedi
Sarah Jornsay-Silverberg
Stephanie Acker
Steve Sugden
Zoe Dolinsky